<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (7) TMI 1536 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460195</link>
    <description>Writ relief was considered in the context of the non-constitution of the Second Appellate Tribunal, with the court examining whether interim protection could be granted against recovery of the remaining demand pending use of the statutory remedy. Interim protection was granted by staying recovery of the balance demand, subject to deposit of the entire tax demand within fifteen days. The interlocutory application was disposed of on that basis.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Jan 2025 19:59:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=788875" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (7) TMI 1536 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460195</link>
      <description>Writ relief was considered in the context of the non-constitution of the Second Appellate Tribunal, with the court examining whether interim protection could be granted against recovery of the remaining demand pending use of the statutory remedy. Interim protection was granted by staying recovery of the balance demand, subject to deposit of the entire tax demand within fifteen days. The interlocutory application was disposed of on that basis.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460195</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>