<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Word “etc.”</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/manuals?id=6828</link>
    <description>The note explains that &quot;etc.&quot; denotes additional unspecified items but its legal effect hinges on context, the parties&#039; intention, customary usage, and placement. It may be construed ejusdem generis-limited to things of the same character-or disregarded as surplusage where it adds no certain meaning; if a single certain meaning is possible that meaning should be applied. Drafters should not rely on &quot;etc.&quot; to expand obligations and should instead use clear language to define scope.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jan 2025 16:22:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2025 13:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=788820" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Word “etc.”</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/manuals?id=6828</link>
      <description>The note explains that &quot;etc.&quot; denotes additional unspecified items but its legal effect hinges on context, the parties&#039; intention, customary usage, and placement. It may be construed ejusdem generis-limited to things of the same character-or disregarded as surplusage where it adds no certain meaning; if a single certain meaning is possible that meaning should be applied. Drafters should not rely on &quot;etc.&quot; to expand obligations and should instead use clear language to define scope.</description>
      <category>Manuals</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jan 2025 16:22:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/manuals?id=6828</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>