https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460165 Review under Order XLVII Rule 1 CPC is maintainable where an error apparent on the face of the record is shown. The High Court held that the earlier revisional order had failed to notice binding Supreme Court law that Article 137 of the Limitation Act applies to applications made to a civil court under any Act, including an application under Section 8(2) of the Arbitration Act. That omission affected the limitation issue and constituted a manifest error, so the review was maintainable and the prior revisional order was rightly recalled. en-us Thu, 10 Jan 1980 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 14 Jan 2025 15:57:28 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460165 Review under Order XLVII Rule 1 CPC is maintainable where an error apparent on the face of the record is shown. The High Court held that the earlier revisional order had failed to notice binding Supreme Court law that Article 137 of the Limitation Act applies to applications made to a civil court under any Act, including an application under Section 8(2) of the Arbitration Act. That omission affected the limitation issue and constituted a manifest error, so the review was maintainable and the prior revisional order was rightly recalled. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 10 Jan 1980 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460165