https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460157 Collective instructions, coordinated pressure, and disciplinary steps by trade associations that prevent members and non-members from dealing with a market participant can amount to an anti-competitive arrangement or tacit understanding under the Competition Act, 2002. The material described minutes, circulars, letters, and witness evidence showing concerted action that restricted the availability of artists, technicians, and production support, and the internal-union-activity defence was rejected. The text also states that office bearers who participate in and implement such association decisions may attract liability, with cease-and-desist and penalty directions sustained. en-us Fri, 13 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 14 Jan 2025 08:00:59 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460157 Collective instructions, coordinated pressure, and disciplinary steps by trade associations that prevent members and non-members from dealing with a market participant can amount to an anti-competitive arrangement or tacit understanding under the Competition Act, 2002. The material described minutes, circulars, letters, and witness evidence showing concerted action that restricted the availability of artists, technicians, and production support, and the internal-union-activity defence was rejected. The text also states that office bearers who participate in and implement such association decisions may attract liability, with cease-and-desist and penalty directions sustained. Case-Laws Law of Competition Fri, 13 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460157