https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764557 An effective statutory appeal under Section 22G of the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 was available against the disciplinary order removing the petitioner's name from the register, so the HC declined to examine the merits under Article 226 and directed the petitioner to pursue the appellate remedy. The Court noted that writ jurisdiction is ordinarily not invoked where an efficacious statutory appeal exists, absent exceptional grounds. Taking account of urgency, it granted only limited interim protection by staying Gazette publication of the removal until an interlocutory application was filed with the appeal. en-us Fri, 03 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 14 Jan 2025 08:00:42 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764557 An effective statutory appeal under Section 22G of the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 was available against the disciplinary order removing the petitioner's name from the register, so the HC declined to examine the merits under Article 226 and directed the petitioner to pursue the appellate remedy. The Court noted that writ jurisdiction is ordinarily not invoked where an efficacious statutory appeal exists, absent exceptional grounds. Taking account of urgency, it granted only limited interim protection by staying Gazette publication of the removal until an interlocutory application was filed with the appeal. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 03 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764557