<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (1) TMI 659 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764596</link>
    <description>The writ relief could not stand because the High Court had relied on earlier decisions that were later set aside by the SC in Assessing Officer (International Taxation) v. Nestle SA. Once the legal foundation for the High Court&#039;s order disappeared, the writ petition had no sustainable basis and was dismissed; the impugned order was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Feb 2025 14:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=788670" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (1) TMI 659 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764596</link>
      <description>The writ relief could not stand because the High Court had relied on earlier decisions that were later set aside by the SC in Assessing Officer (International Taxation) v. Nestle SA. Once the legal foundation for the High Court&#039;s order disappeared, the writ petition had no sustainable basis and was dismissed; the impugned order was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764596</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>