<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (2) TMI 1504 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460142</link>
    <description>A lender may assign its debt asset to an asset reconstruction company under the SARFAESI framework even without a prior NPA declaration or borrower consent, where the account is otherwise stressed or irregular. RBI directions distinguish between standard, stressed, SMA and NPA accounts, and transfer of financial assets is not confined to accounts already classified as NPAs. The borrower&#039;s rights are not defeated by the assignment itself, and prior notice or consent is not a precondition for validity. A writ petition seeking to restrain recall and recovery measures in a private loan dispute was also held not maintainable in the absence of a statutory infraction, and the Court refused Article 226 interference in commercial recovery decisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Jan 2025 16:04:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=788629" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (2) TMI 1504 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460142</link>
      <description>A lender may assign its debt asset to an asset reconstruction company under the SARFAESI framework even without a prior NPA declaration or borrower consent, where the account is otherwise stressed or irregular. RBI directions distinguish between standard, stressed, SMA and NPA accounts, and transfer of financial assets is not confined to accounts already classified as NPAs. The borrower&#039;s rights are not defeated by the assignment itself, and prior notice or consent is not a precondition for validity. A writ petition seeking to restrain recall and recovery measures in a private loan dispute was also held not maintainable in the absence of a statutory infraction, and the Court refused Article 226 interference in commercial recovery decisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460142</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>