<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (7) TMI 115 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40319</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court upheld the High Court&#039;s construction of the rule, finding no error in the interpretation adopted below and describing the judgment as unexceptionable. The civil appeal was dismissed, and no further examination on the merits was required once the Court affirmed that construction. Costs were awarded to the respondent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2018 17:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=78861" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (7) TMI 115 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40319</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court upheld the High Court&#039;s construction of the rule, finding no error in the interpretation adopted below and describing the judgment as unexceptionable. The civil appeal was dismissed, and no further examination on the merits was required once the Court affirmed that construction. Costs were awarded to the respondent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40319</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>