https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40315 Section 100 CPC confines a second appeal to a substantial question of law, which must be specifically stated, identified by the High Court, and formulated before hearing, subject only to the limited power to consider another such question for recorded reasons. The High Court was therefore not justified in dismissing the second appeal summarily without following that requirement. A first appellate court, though final on facts, must give reasoned consideration when reversing the trial court, particularly on possession, adverse possession and limitation. Because the reversal was brief and did not adequately engage with the trial court's findings, the matter required reconsideration on a properly formulated substantial question of law. en-us Thu, 08 Feb 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 06 Oct 2025 15:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40315 Section 100 CPC confines a second appeal to a substantial question of law, which must be specifically stated, identified by the High Court, and formulated before hearing, subject only to the limited power to consider another such question for recorded reasons. The High Court was therefore not justified in dismissing the second appeal summarily without following that requirement. A first appellate court, though final on facts, must give reasoned consideration when reversing the trial court, particularly on possession, adverse possession and limitation. Because the reversal was brief and did not adequately engage with the trial court's findings, the matter required reconsideration on a properly formulated substantial question of law. Case-Laws Income Tax Thu, 08 Feb 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40315