<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (1) TMI 595 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764533</link>
    <description>An order rejecting a rectification application under the Income-tax Act was quashed because the authority failed to comply with a prior direction to grant a personal hearing before deciding the matter. Although notice was issued and information was called for, no effective hearing date was fixed and the application was decided without the mandated opportunity. The High Court held the order unsustainable and remanded the matter for fresh decision after hearing the petitioner.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=788413" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (1) TMI 595 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764533</link>
      <description>An order rejecting a rectification application under the Income-tax Act was quashed because the authority failed to comply with a prior direction to grant a personal hearing before deciding the matter. Although notice was issued and information was called for, no effective hearing date was fixed and the application was decided without the mandated opportunity. The High Court held the order unsustainable and remanded the matter for fresh decision after hearing the petitioner.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764533</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>