<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (7) TMI 115 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40299</link>
    <description>A judgment cannot be sustained where its legal basis has already been overruled by a later binding decision. The Court applied the controlling precedent, found that the impugned judgment had proceeded on an earlier view that no longer survived, and therefore set it aside. The appeals were allowed because the decision under challenge could not stand once the authoritative ruling was applied.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2018 18:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=78841" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (7) TMI 115 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40299</link>
      <description>A judgment cannot be sustained where its legal basis has already been overruled by a later binding decision. The Court applied the controlling precedent, found that the impugned judgment had proceeded on an earlier view that no longer survived, and therefore set it aside. The appeals were allowed because the decision under challenge could not stand once the authoritative ruling was applied.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40299</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>