<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (3) TMI 1469 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460119</link>
    <description>In proceedings under Section 19 of the Competition Act, 2002, the petitioner was permitted to make oral submissions through video conferencing, and those submissions had to be considered along with the documentary evidence before final orders were passed. The document clarifies that oral hearing by video link may be allowed in the proceeding and that the decision-maker must take those oral submissions into account before concluding the matter.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Jan 2025 21:42:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=788356" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (3) TMI 1469 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460119</link>
      <description>In proceedings under Section 19 of the Competition Act, 2002, the petitioner was permitted to make oral submissions through video conferencing, and those submissions had to be considered along with the documentary evidence before final orders were passed. The document clarifies that oral hearing by video link may be allowed in the proceeding and that the decision-maker must take those oral submissions into account before concluding the matter.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Law of Competition</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460119</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>