https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460113 The HC dismissed the writ petition, ruling it non-maintainable due to the availability of an alternative statutory remedy under the Competition Act, 2002, and the non-joinder of a necessary party. The court found the bid conditions reasonable, non-arbitrary, and within the tendering authority's discretion, aimed at ensuring bidder capability. It determined there was no violation of the Competition Act, as no anti-competitive agreement or dominant position abuse was present. Additionally, the court held that the bid conditions did not infringe upon the petitioner's constitutional rights under Articles 14, 19, and 21. The interim order was vacated. en-us Fri, 28 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 11 Jan 2025 11:48:03 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460113 The HC dismissed the writ petition, ruling it non-maintainable due to the availability of an alternative statutory remedy under the Competition Act, 2002, and the non-joinder of a necessary party. The court found the bid conditions reasonable, non-arbitrary, and within the tendering authority's discretion, aimed at ensuring bidder capability. It determined there was no violation of the Competition Act, as no anti-competitive agreement or dominant position abuse was present. Additionally, the court held that the bid conditions did not infringe upon the petitioner's constitutional rights under Articles 14, 19, and 21. The interim order was vacated. Case-Laws Law of Competition Fri, 28 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460113