<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (4) TMI 73 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40276</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals regarding the entitlement to set-off under section 78(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, in relation to losses sustained in a deceased individual&#039;s proprietary business against the income of a registered partnership firm. The Court upheld the lower courts&#039; decisions, emphasizing the continuity of the business and the legal heirs&#039; intention to carry it forward, concluding that the partners had succeeded to the deceased&#039;s business, justifying the set-off of losses. The Court found no grounds for interference and supported the allowance of the set-off under section 78(2) of the Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2014 12:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=78818" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (4) TMI 73 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40276</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals regarding the entitlement to set-off under section 78(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, in relation to losses sustained in a deceased individual&#039;s proprietary business against the income of a registered partnership firm. The Court upheld the lower courts&#039; decisions, emphasizing the continuity of the business and the legal heirs&#039; intention to carry it forward, concluding that the partners had succeeded to the deceased&#039;s business, justifying the set-off of losses. The Court found no grounds for interference and supported the allowance of the set-off under section 78(2) of the Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40276</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>