https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764465 CESTAT Allahabad dismissed the appeal for non-compliance with Section 35F pre-deposit requirements and on merits. However, the tribunal found the original order violated natural justice principles and set it aside. The matter was remanded to the Commissioner (Appeals) for fresh consideration, with the tribunal directing that pre-deposits already made should be treated as sufficient without requiring additional deposits. Appeal allowed through remand. en-us Wed, 18 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 09 Jul 2025 13:03:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764465 CESTAT Allahabad dismissed the appeal for non-compliance with Section 35F pre-deposit requirements and on merits. However, the tribunal found the original order violated natural justice principles and set it aside. The matter was remanded to the Commissioner (Appeals) for fresh consideration, with the tribunal directing that pre-deposits already made should be treated as sufficient without requiring additional deposits. Appeal allowed through remand. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 18 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764465