<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (1) TMI 564 - ITAT PATNA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764502</link>
    <description>ITAT PATNA-AT upheld validity of the search and assessment under section 153A, finding credible information and substantial undisclosed investments; consequential additions generally sustained. CIT(A)&#039;s partial allowance for household expenses (specified amounts) was affirmed. Inclusion of income assessed under an alias into the assessee&#039;s income was upheld due to use of multiple aliases and lack of separate existence. Claim of a gift from the grandmother was rejected for lack of donor&#039;s disclosed source. However, an addition of Rs. 80,000 made on estimation for alleged onion business was deleted for lack of material proving the business.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2025 16:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=788141" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (1) TMI 564 - ITAT PATNA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764502</link>
      <description>ITAT PATNA-AT upheld validity of the search and assessment under section 153A, finding credible information and substantial undisclosed investments; consequential additions generally sustained. CIT(A)&#039;s partial allowance for household expenses (specified amounts) was affirmed. Inclusion of income assessed under an alias into the assessee&#039;s income was upheld due to use of multiple aliases and lack of separate existence. Claim of a gift from the grandmother was rejected for lack of donor&#039;s disclosed source. However, an addition of Rs. 80,000 made on estimation for alleged onion business was deleted for lack of material proving the business.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764502</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>