<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (1) TMI 574 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764512</link>
    <description>ITAT Ahmedabad held that addition of unexplained on-money paid to developer cannot be sustained solely based on excel-sheet found during third-party search and developer&#039;s confession to Settlement Commission. Court ruled that corroborative evidence was required beyond third-party data and admission, especially given assessee&#039;s complete denial. Despite developer&#039;s admission of receiving on-money, denial of cross-examination opportunity made the addition unsustainable. Addition deleted in favor of assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Jan 2025 19:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=788131" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (1) TMI 574 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764512</link>
      <description>ITAT Ahmedabad held that addition of unexplained on-money paid to developer cannot be sustained solely based on excel-sheet found during third-party search and developer&#039;s confession to Settlement Commission. Court ruled that corroborative evidence was required beyond third-party data and admission, especially given assessee&#039;s complete denial. Despite developer&#039;s admission of receiving on-money, denial of cross-examination opportunity made the addition unsustainable. Addition deleted in favor of assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764512</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>