<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (1) TMI 587 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764525</link>
    <description>The HC held that the petition was not maintainable as an alternative remedy existed under Section 107 of the GGST/CGST Act 2017, allowing the petitioner to appeal before the competent appellate authority. The petition was disposed of with liberty granted to file such an appeal. Regarding the challenge to the notice under Section 130 of the Act, the petitioner was permitted to submit a response before the appropriate authority.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2025 14:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=788118" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (1) TMI 587 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764525</link>
      <description>The HC held that the petition was not maintainable as an alternative remedy existed under Section 107 of the GGST/CGST Act 2017, allowing the petitioner to appeal before the competent appellate authority. The petition was disposed of with liberty granted to file such an appeal. Regarding the challenge to the notice under Section 130 of the Act, the petitioner was permitted to submit a response before the appropriate authority.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764525</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>