<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (1) TMI 589 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764527</link>
    <description>The HC stayed the operation and effect of the impugned order and show cause notice concerning whether issuing corporate guarantees by the petitioner constitutes a supply under Section 7 of the CGST Act. The petitioner was directed to file any affidavit in rejoinder within two weeks after the respondent&#039;s affidavit in reply, which must be filed within four weeks. The matter was adjourned for further hearing on 18th February 2025.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 May 2026 15:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=788116" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (1) TMI 589 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764527</link>
      <description>The HC stayed the operation and effect of the impugned order and show cause notice concerning whether issuing corporate guarantees by the petitioner constitutes a supply under Section 7 of the CGST Act. The petitioner was directed to file any affidavit in rejoinder within two weeks after the respondent&#039;s affidavit in reply, which must be filed within four weeks. The matter was adjourned for further hearing on 18th February 2025.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764527</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>