https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460088 A challenge to the validity of a sanction order should ordinarily be raised at the earliest available stage before the trial court, though a later challenge is not absolutely barred if delay is explained and the objection was not previously taken. The sanction regime under Section 45 of the UAPA read with Rules 3 and 4 of the 2008 Rules requires strict compliance with the prescribed timelines and an independent review by the appointed authority, because these safeguards control executive power and protect the accused. The mandatory nature of those requirements means non-compliance can vitiate the proceedings. en-us Mon, 23 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 09 Jan 2025 12:00:58 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460088 A challenge to the validity of a sanction order should ordinarily be raised at the earliest available stage before the trial court, though a later challenge is not absolutely barred if delay is explained and the objection was not previously taken. The sanction regime under Section 45 of the UAPA read with Rules 3 and 4 of the 2008 Rules requires strict compliance with the prescribed timelines and an independent review by the appointed authority, because these safeguards control executive power and protect the accused. The mandatory nature of those requirements means non-compliance can vitiate the proceedings. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 23 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460088