<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (10) TMI 1480 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460102</link>
    <description>Limitation for filing the appeal was counted from the date of service of the copy of the order under challenge, and on that basis the delay was treated as condonable in view of the tax effect involved. The delay of 588 days in filing the appeal was condoned, and the appeal was directed to be listed for admission.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2025 13:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=788071" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (10) TMI 1480 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460102</link>
      <description>Limitation for filing the appeal was counted from the date of service of the copy of the order under challenge, and on that basis the delay was treated as condonable in view of the tax effect involved. The delay of 588 days in filing the appeal was condoned, and the appeal was directed to be listed for admission.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460102</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>