https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460108 The anti-profiteering report was found incomplete because the saleable area figures were discrepant, the treatment of flats relatable to landowners remained unclear, and bifurcated CENVAT/ITC figures for rehab and sale buildings were not provided. Supporting documents for homebuyers and consideration received were also not fully produced or verified. As a result, the report could not sustain a final profiteering determination and the matter was remanded for reinvestigation. The DGAP was directed to obtain the missing particulars, reconcile the figures, and submit a complete report. en-us Fri, 29 Dec 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 22 Apr 2025 16:26:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460108 The anti-profiteering report was found incomplete because the saleable area figures were discrepant, the treatment of flats relatable to landowners remained unclear, and bifurcated CENVAT/ITC figures for rehab and sale buildings were not provided. Supporting documents for homebuyers and consideration received were also not fully produced or verified. As a result, the report could not sustain a final profiteering determination and the matter was remanded for reinvestigation. The DGAP was directed to obtain the missing particulars, reconcile the figures, and submit a complete report. Case-Laws GST Fri, 29 Dec 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460108