https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460110 GST liability under the reverse charge mechanism on seigniorage paid to the Government was challenged in a writ petition. The Madras HC referred to directions in connected writ petitions requiring adjudication on merits while keeping adjudication orders in abeyance and barring recovery until the Nine Judge Constitution Bench decides the nature of royalty. In light of that binding course, the petition was not separately decided on merits and was disposed of accordingly, with pending miscellaneous petitions closed. en-us Fri, 16 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 25 Apr 2025 15:01:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460110 GST liability under the reverse charge mechanism on seigniorage paid to the Government was challenged in a writ petition. The Madras HC referred to directions in connected writ petitions requiring adjudication on merits while keeping adjudication orders in abeyance and barring recovery until the Nine Judge Constitution Bench decides the nature of royalty. In light of that binding course, the petition was not separately decided on merits and was disposed of accordingly, with pending miscellaneous petitions closed. Case-Laws GST Fri, 16 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460110