<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (8) TMI 82 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40262</link>
    <description>No referable question of law arose from the Tribunal&#039;s factual finding that the assessee had concealed income in relation to the sale consideration of land. The High Court was correct in treating the proposed issues as questions of fact and in refusing to call for a reference. On that basis, the concealment finding supporting penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, was left undisturbed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Apr 2010 15:54:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=78804" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (8) TMI 82 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40262</link>
      <description>No referable question of law arose from the Tribunal&#039;s factual finding that the assessee had concealed income in relation to the sale consideration of land. The High Court was correct in treating the proposed issues as questions of fact and in refusing to call for a reference. On that basis, the concealment finding supporting penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, was left undisturbed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40262</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>