https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460081 Where the Official Liquidator had already adjudicated and admitted the claimant's quantified claim after an earlier order on pari passu distribution, no fresh direction could be sought from the Company Court for payment from sale proceeds. Once the claimant had notice of that adjudication, the proper remedy was to challenge the adjudication in the manner available in law, not to seek repeated relief on the same basis. In the absence of any separate challenge to the adjudication, no live controversy remained, and the application for further relief was dismissed as not maintainable. en-us Thu, 18 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 10 Jan 2025 14:55:08 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460081 Where the Official Liquidator had already adjudicated and admitted the claimant's quantified claim after an earlier order on pari passu distribution, no fresh direction could be sought from the Company Court for payment from sale proceeds. Once the claimant had notice of that adjudication, the proper remedy was to challenge the adjudication in the manner available in law, not to seek repeated relief on the same basis. In the absence of any separate challenge to the adjudication, no live controversy remained, and the application for further relief was dismissed as not maintainable. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 18 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460081