https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460075 The HC ruled in favor of the appellant, a claimant under the Freedom Fighters Pension Scheme, 1972. The Court determined that the appellant was entitled to receive the pension from March 1996, when he filed his writ petition, rather than from the original application date. The HC criticized the respondents' technical objections and emphasized a liberal interpretation of the scheme's humanitarian objectives. The cancellation of the appellant's pension was set aside, and the Court ordered the payment of arrears with interest for delays, awarding costs to the appellant. en-us Tue, 25 Sep 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 10 Jan 2025 12:37:50 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460075 The HC ruled in favor of the appellant, a claimant under the Freedom Fighters Pension Scheme, 1972. The Court determined that the appellant was entitled to receive the pension from March 1996, when he filed his writ petition, rather than from the original application date. The HC criticized the respondents' technical objections and emphasized a liberal interpretation of the scheme's humanitarian objectives. The cancellation of the appellant's pension was set aside, and the Court ordered the payment of arrears with interest for delays, awarding costs to the appellant. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 25 Sep 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460075