<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (12) TMI 97 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40250</link>
    <description>The distinction between a provision and a reserve under the surtax law depends on substance, purpose, and surrounding circumstances, not merely on how the amount is appropriated in the accounts. A provision is a charge against profits made to meet a known liability or diminution in asset value, while a reserve is an appropriation of profits retained as part of capital employed. Amounts set aside to meet a loan liability, rather than to acquire an asset or strengthen capital, are treated as provisions. On that basis, the amount in the loan redemption reserve was held to be a provision and not a reserve, so it could not be included in capital for surtax computation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2014 23:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=78792" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (12) TMI 97 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40250</link>
      <description>The distinction between a provision and a reserve under the surtax law depends on substance, purpose, and surrounding circumstances, not merely on how the amount is appropriated in the accounts. A provision is a charge against profits made to meet a known liability or diminution in asset value, while a reserve is an appropriation of profits retained as part of capital employed. Amounts set aside to meet a loan liability, rather than to acquire an asset or strengthen capital, are treated as provisions. On that basis, the amount in the loan redemption reserve was held to be a provision and not a reserve, so it could not be included in capital for surtax computation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40250</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>