https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460071 A recall petition was held not maintainable against a reasoned pre-admission order in winding up proceedings where the company had been given notice, filed counter-affidavits and been fully heard. In the absence of fraud, breach of natural justice or clerical error, recall could not be used as a substitute for appeal or review, and inherent powers could not reopen an order passed on merits. Alleged later developments, including incomplete construction, absence of an occupancy certificate, continued negative net worth and limitation objections, did not justify recall because they did not cure the grounds on which the earlier order had been made. en-us Fri, 27 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 07 Jun 2025 13:44:12 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460071 A recall petition was held not maintainable against a reasoned pre-admission order in winding up proceedings where the company had been given notice, filed counter-affidavits and been fully heard. In the absence of fraud, breach of natural justice or clerical error, recall could not be used as a substitute for appeal or review, and inherent powers could not reopen an order passed on merits. Alleged later developments, including incomplete construction, absence of an occupancy certificate, continued negative net worth and limitation objections, did not justify recall because they did not cure the grounds on which the earlier order had been made. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 27 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460071