<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (10) TMI 48 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40244</link>
    <description>Allotment and adjustment of partnership assets on dissolution, including release of rights in favour of the continuing partner for consideration, did not amount to a gift or transfer of property under the Gift-tax Act, 1958. The Court held that the statutory concept of &quot;transfer&quot; requires a voluntary disposition without consideration, and that a partner has no exclusive right in specific firm assets during the subsistence of the partnership. On dissolution, distribution of assets is a mutual adjustment of rights, not a transfer in the strict legal sense. The Revenue&#039;s authorities were distinguished on their facts, and the assessment of gift-tax could not be sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2025 16:20:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=78786" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (10) TMI 48 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40244</link>
      <description>Allotment and adjustment of partnership assets on dissolution, including release of rights in favour of the continuing partner for consideration, did not amount to a gift or transfer of property under the Gift-tax Act, 1958. The Court held that the statutory concept of &quot;transfer&quot; requires a voluntary disposition without consideration, and that a partner has no exclusive right in specific firm assets during the subsistence of the partnership. On dissolution, distribution of assets is a mutual adjustment of rights, not a transfer in the strict legal sense. The Revenue&#039;s authorities were distinguished on their facts, and the assessment of gift-tax could not be sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40244</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>