<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (9) TMI 68 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40240</link>
    <description>On a partner&#039;s retirement from a firm, the amount received on settlement of his share is not treated as a transfer of property constituting a gift under the Gift-tax Act. A retiring partner is entitled only to the value of his share in the partnership assets after liabilities, and any shortfall from market value, including where goodwill is not separately valued, does not amount to a transfer by the retiring partner to the continuing partners. The word &quot;settlement&quot; in the statutory definition refers to a settlement upon trust, not a settlement of accounts. Accordingly, no gift arose on the facts, and gift-tax was not chargeable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2014 14:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=78782" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (9) TMI 68 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40240</link>
      <description>On a partner&#039;s retirement from a firm, the amount received on settlement of his share is not treated as a transfer of property constituting a gift under the Gift-tax Act. A retiring partner is entitled only to the value of his share in the partnership assets after liabilities, and any shortfall from market value, including where goodwill is not separately valued, does not amount to a transfer by the retiring partner to the continuing partners. The word &quot;settlement&quot; in the statutory definition refers to a settlement upon trust, not a settlement of accounts. Accordingly, no gift arose on the facts, and gift-tax was not chargeable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40240</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>