<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (1) TMI 485 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764423</link>
    <description>An operational creditor&#039;s Section 9 IBC application is not maintainable where the record shows a real and existing dispute before the demand notice. Here, arbitration had been invoked before the Section 8 demand notice, and the dispute concerned the same work order and the same claim that formed the alleged operational debt. The adjudicating authority must examine whether a pre-existing dispute exists on the material record, and the presence of a prior notice of arbitration or dispute is sufficient to bar admission. The fact that the corporate debtor did not alone raise the objection was not decisive, because the underlying transaction was already disputed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Jan 2025 08:57:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=787800" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (1) TMI 485 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764423</link>
      <description>An operational creditor&#039;s Section 9 IBC application is not maintainable where the record shows a real and existing dispute before the demand notice. Here, arbitration had been invoked before the Section 8 demand notice, and the dispute concerned the same work order and the same claim that formed the alleged operational debt. The adjudicating authority must examine whether a pre-existing dispute exists on the material record, and the presence of a prior notice of arbitration or dispute is sufficient to bar admission. The fact that the corporate debtor did not alone raise the objection was not decisive, because the underlying transaction was already disputed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764423</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>