<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (1) TMI 495 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764433</link>
    <description>In the SC case, the Court condoned an 89-day delay in filing a civil appeal. After considering the appellant&#039;s arguments and reviewing the record, the Court decided not to interfere with the order from the Central Excise Service Tax Appellate Tribunal. The Civil Appeal was dismissed, and all pending applications were disposed of.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Jan 2025 08:57:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=787790" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (1) TMI 495 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764433</link>
      <description>In the SC case, the Court condoned an 89-day delay in filing a civil appeal. After considering the appellant&#039;s arguments and reviewing the record, the Court decided not to interfere with the order from the Central Excise Service Tax Appellate Tribunal. The Civil Appeal was dismissed, and all pending applications were disposed of.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764433</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>