<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (1) TMI 500 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764438</link>
    <description>The ITAT Jaipur held that when an AO reopens assessment u/s 147 for cash deposits but finds the deposits are from genuine sources, the AO loses jurisdiction to make other additions. The AO examined cash deposits during proceedings and made no addition on this score, instead disallowing claims u/s 80P for interest income and surplus. The tribunal ruled that once the specific reason for reassessment (cash deposits) was found satisfactory, the AO had no jurisdiction to assess other concealment issues. Following jurisdictional HC precedent, the tribunal held all other disallowances/additions were illegal and allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Jan 2025 08:57:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=787785" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (1) TMI 500 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764438</link>
      <description>The ITAT Jaipur held that when an AO reopens assessment u/s 147 for cash deposits but finds the deposits are from genuine sources, the AO loses jurisdiction to make other additions. The AO examined cash deposits during proceedings and made no addition on this score, instead disallowing claims u/s 80P for interest income and surplus. The tribunal ruled that once the specific reason for reassessment (cash deposits) was found satisfactory, the AO had no jurisdiction to assess other concealment issues. Following jurisdictional HC precedent, the tribunal held all other disallowances/additions were illegal and allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764438</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>