https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460067 Trust property vested in an idol cannot be validly conveyed by a trustee or manager who has no title to transfer, so an alienee under such a transaction acquires no enforceable title against the idol or a succeeding trustee. Article 134 of the Limitation Act, 1908 applies only where the transferor could convey title, and therefore does not bar a suit for recovery in these circumstances. Possession derived from the trustee is not adverse to the trust, and Article 144 and Section 28 do not defeat the claim unless possession is shown to have become independently adverse to the trust. The temple trustee was entitled to recover the property. en-us Wed, 28 Oct 1925 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 09 Jan 2025 17:30:39 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460067 Trust property vested in an idol cannot be validly conveyed by a trustee or manager who has no title to transfer, so an alienee under such a transaction acquires no enforceable title against the idol or a succeeding trustee. Article 134 of the Limitation Act, 1908 applies only where the transferor could convey title, and therefore does not bar a suit for recovery in these circumstances. Possession derived from the trustee is not adverse to the trust, and Article 144 and Section 28 do not defeat the claim unless possession is shown to have become independently adverse to the trust. The temple trustee was entitled to recover the property. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 28 Oct 1925 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460067