<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1968 (7) TMI 91 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460063</link>
    <description>A government-confirmed grant that includes a condition protecting cultivators from eviction creates an enforceable right or privilege preserved by the Act&#039;s saving provision. Section 18 was construed broadly to protect existing rights arising from a grant, so tenants could rely on the no-eviction condition against any attempt to displace them. A personal-cultivation allotment under Chapter IV could not be made where its effect would be to defeat that protected contractual restraint, because the Mamlatdar lacked power to pass an order abridging rights preserved by the statute. The ratio is that preserved grant-based tenant protection prevails over inconsistent allotment proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jul 1968 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2026 12:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=787688" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1968 (7) TMI 91 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460063</link>
      <description>A government-confirmed grant that includes a condition protecting cultivators from eviction creates an enforceable right or privilege preserved by the Act&#039;s saving provision. Section 18 was construed broadly to protect existing rights arising from a grant, so tenants could rely on the no-eviction condition against any attempt to displace them. A personal-cultivation allotment under Chapter IV could not be made where its effect would be to defeat that protected contractual restraint, because the Mamlatdar lacked power to pass an order abridging rights preserved by the statute. The ratio is that preserved grant-based tenant protection prevails over inconsistent allotment proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jul 1968 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460063</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>