https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764399 The Bombay HC upheld a transfer order under Section 127(2) of the Income Tax Act, moving the petitioner's case from Mumbai to New Delhi for centralized investigation with other Pacific Group entities. The court found the order properly reasoned, noting revenue protection through coordinated investigation outweighed assessee convenience, especially given technological advances reducing travel necessity. The court rejected challenges based on alleged lack of reasoning and absence of agreement between Commissioners, finding adequate opportunity for hearing was provided and communications between the jurisdictional officers demonstrated proper coordination regarding bogus transactions worth Rs.1 crore. en-us Tue, 07 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 09 Jun 2025 16:25:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764399 The Bombay HC upheld a transfer order under Section 127(2) of the Income Tax Act, moving the petitioner's case from Mumbai to New Delhi for centralized investigation with other Pacific Group entities. The court found the order properly reasoned, noting revenue protection through coordinated investigation outweighed assessee convenience, especially given technological advances reducing travel necessity. The court rejected challenges based on alleged lack of reasoning and absence of agreement between Commissioners, finding adequate opportunity for hearing was provided and communications between the jurisdictional officers demonstrated proper coordination regarding bogus transactions worth Rs.1 crore. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 07 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764399