<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (1) TMI 463 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764401</link>
    <description>In SC, a Special Leave Petition was dismissed due to a 180-day filing delay that was not satisfactorily explained. The Court, presided over by Justices J.B. Pardiwala and R. Mahadevan, found no merit in the petition. Consequently, the petition was dismissed both on the grounds of delay and merits. All pending applications related to the case were also disposed of.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Jan 2025 07:46:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=787526" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (1) TMI 463 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764401</link>
      <description>In SC, a Special Leave Petition was dismissed due to a 180-day filing delay that was not satisfactorily explained. The Court, presided over by Justices J.B. Pardiwala and R. Mahadevan, found no merit in the petition. Consequently, the petition was dismissed both on the grounds of delay and merits. All pending applications related to the case were also disposed of.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764401</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>