<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (1) TMI 70 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40209</link>
    <description>A board-resolved interim dividend paid during the relevant previous year was not treated as a declaration of dividend by the company in general meeting. Under the Finance Act, 1964, rebate reduction applies where dividend is declared or distributed during the previous year, and Explanation 3 protects only dividends declared before that year and distributed within it. Because an interim dividend resolved by the board does not create an enforceable debt or amount to a company declaration, the operative event for tax purposes was its distribution. On that basis, the rebate reduction applied and the issue was answered in favour of the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2014 17:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=78751" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (1) TMI 70 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40209</link>
      <description>A board-resolved interim dividend paid during the relevant previous year was not treated as a declaration of dividend by the company in general meeting. Under the Finance Act, 1964, rebate reduction applies where dividend is declared or distributed during the previous year, and Explanation 3 protects only dividends declared before that year and distributed within it. Because an interim dividend resolved by the board does not create an enforceable debt or amount to a company declaration, the operative event for tax purposes was its distribution. On that basis, the rebate reduction applied and the issue was answered in favour of the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40209</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>