https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40207 The Supreme Court dismissed both the civil appeal and the special leave petition, upholding the findings of the lower courts that the property was purchased benami by Ujagar Lal in the name of Rebti Devi. The court also clarified that the Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988, did not retrospectively bar the benami plea raised before May 19, 1988. en-us Wed, 19 Nov 1997 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 25 Dec 2019 18:05:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40207 The Supreme Court dismissed both the civil appeal and the special leave petition, upholding the findings of the lower courts that the property was purchased benami by Ujagar Lal in the name of Rebti Devi. The court also clarified that the Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988, did not retrospectively bar the benami plea raised before May 19, 1988. Case-Laws Benami Property Wed, 19 Nov 1997 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40207