https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460030 Delegated disciplinary power was held limited to the scope of the resolution, so the Commissioner could not independently impose dismissal for misconduct outside that remit. The subsequent ratification by the competent General Board, which had authority to impose the penalty, cured the initial defect and gave retrospective validity to the dismissal order. The challenge to the dismissal therefore failed, the High Court's writ relief was set aside, and the dismissal from service was restored, with protection against recovery of amounts already paid. en-us Tue, 02 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 08 Jan 2025 18:56:53 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460030 Delegated disciplinary power was held limited to the scope of the resolution, so the Commissioner could not independently impose dismissal for misconduct outside that remit. The subsequent ratification by the competent General Board, which had authority to impose the penalty, cured the initial defect and gave retrospective validity to the dismissal order. The challenge to the dismissal therefore failed, the High Court's writ relief was set aside, and the dismissal from service was restored, with protection against recovery of amounts already paid. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 02 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460030