<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (7) TMI 1707 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460038</link>
    <description>The ITAT Ahmedabad ruled on a transfer pricing adjustment case involving software development services to associate enterprises. The tribunal partially accepted the assessee&#039;s appeal, directing the TPO to exclude Bodhtree Consulting Ltd from comparables due to functional differences, as it provides software products rather than development services. However, the tribunal rejected arguments against including Compu Learn India Tech Ltd, noting its PLI of 88.83% remained valid. The TPO was directed to conduct proper inquiry under rule 10B(3) and consider working capital adjustments while providing adequate hearing opportunity.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Jan 2025 15:33:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=787471" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (7) TMI 1707 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460038</link>
      <description>The ITAT Ahmedabad ruled on a transfer pricing adjustment case involving software development services to associate enterprises. The tribunal partially accepted the assessee&#039;s appeal, directing the TPO to exclude Bodhtree Consulting Ltd from comparables due to functional differences, as it provides software products rather than development services. However, the tribunal rejected arguments against including Compu Learn India Tech Ltd, noting its PLI of 88.83% remained valid. The TPO was directed to conduct proper inquiry under rule 10B(3) and consider working capital adjustments while providing adequate hearing opportunity.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460038</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>