https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460020 Disputes alleging oppression and mismanagement under sections 397, 398 and 402 of the Companies Act, 1956 cannot be referred to arbitration under section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 where the reliefs sought belong to the special statutory jurisdiction of the company forum and include powers an arbitrator cannot exercise. The arbitration clause may govern inter se contractual disputes, but it does not curtail the statutory remedy before the Company Law Board. A composite order dismissing such a company petition is appealable under section 10F on questions of law, so the High Court may entertain the challenge. en-us Tue, 31 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 08 Jan 2025 15:47:53 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460020 Disputes alleging oppression and mismanagement under sections 397, 398 and 402 of the Companies Act, 1956 cannot be referred to arbitration under section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 where the reliefs sought belong to the special statutory jurisdiction of the company forum and include powers an arbitrator cannot exercise. The arbitration clause may govern inter se contractual disputes, but it does not curtail the statutory remedy before the Company Law Board. A composite order dismissing such a company petition is appealable under section 10F on questions of law, so the High Court may entertain the challenge. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 31 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460020