https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460017 An alleged agreement to transfer inherited property could not confer title on the transferee or his heirs because title in such property required a registered instrument, and the facts did not satisfy Section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882. Even if the agreement were valid and specifically enforceable, the proper remedy would have been specific performance, not an assertion of ownership through equity. After Section 53A, the doctrine of part performance in India operates only within its statutory limits and cannot be used to defeat the requirement of registration or create title where the statutory conditions are unmet. en-us Fri, 10 May 1963 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 08 Jan 2025 13:14:45 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460017 An alleged agreement to transfer inherited property could not confer title on the transferee or his heirs because title in such property required a registered instrument, and the facts did not satisfy Section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882. Even if the agreement were valid and specifically enforceable, the proper remedy would have been specific performance, not an assertion of ownership through equity. After Section 53A, the doctrine of part performance in India operates only within its statutory limits and cannot be used to defeat the requirement of registration or create title where the statutory conditions are unmet. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 10 May 1963 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460017