https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460012 The HC dismissed the writ petition filed under Article 226, ruling it not maintainable as it involved a private contractual dispute with significant factual contentions. The petitioner sought the operation of a frozen Demat account, which was blocked due to a criminal complaint questioning the legitimacy of a share transfer. The court emphasized that Article 226 is unsuitable for resolving complex factual disputes inherent in private contracts. The petitioner was advised to pursue alternative legal remedies, such as civil litigation or arbitration, to address the contractual issues and the freezing of the account. en-us Mon, 13 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 08 Jan 2025 12:37:59 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460012 The HC dismissed the writ petition filed under Article 226, ruling it not maintainable as it involved a private contractual dispute with significant factual contentions. The petitioner sought the operation of a frozen Demat account, which was blocked due to a criminal complaint questioning the legitimacy of a share transfer. The court emphasized that Article 226 is unsuitable for resolving complex factual disputes inherent in private contracts. The petitioner was advised to pursue alternative legal remedies, such as civil litigation or arbitration, to address the contractual issues and the freezing of the account. Case-Laws SEBI Mon, 13 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460012