<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (2) TMI 130 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40190</link>
    <description>For surtax capital computation, an appropriation for doubtful debts created out of the profit and loss account, without reference to any existing or ascertained liability, was treated as a reserve and was includible in capital base. By contrast, classification of a gratuity appropriation depends on whether it represents a provision for a known contingent liability or an excess over such provision, ordinarily requiring actuarial or other reliable material. As no actuarial valuation or comparable basis was available, the gratuity item could not be conclusively classified on the existing record and was remitted for fresh determination on proper material and principles.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2014 12:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=78732" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (2) TMI 130 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40190</link>
      <description>For surtax capital computation, an appropriation for doubtful debts created out of the profit and loss account, without reference to any existing or ascertained liability, was treated as a reserve and was includible in capital base. By contrast, classification of a gratuity appropriation depends on whether it represents a provision for a known contingent liability or an excess over such provision, ordinarily requiring actuarial or other reliable material. As no actuarial valuation or comparable basis was available, the gratuity item could not be conclusively classified on the existing record and was remitted for fresh determination on proper material and principles.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40190</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>