<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (1) TMI 77 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40183</link>
    <description>An arbitral award distributing the residue of dissolved partnership firms did not amount to a partition or transfer of immovable property requiring registration under section 17(1) of the Registration Act. The analysis treats a partner&#039;s interest as confined to the surplus remaining after discharge of liabilities, so allocation of partnership assets on dissolution is a mutual adjustment of rights under the Partnership Act. Even where the award used language of exclusive allotment to individual partners, its legal character remained a distribution of partnership residue rather than an extinguishment of interest in specific immovable property.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 May 2016 10:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=78725" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (1) TMI 77 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40183</link>
      <description>An arbitral award distributing the residue of dissolved partnership firms did not amount to a partition or transfer of immovable property requiring registration under section 17(1) of the Registration Act. The analysis treats a partner&#039;s interest as confined to the surplus remaining after discharge of liabilities, so allocation of partnership assets on dissolution is a mutual adjustment of rights under the Partnership Act. Even where the award used language of exclusive allotment to individual partners, its legal character remained a distribution of partnership residue rather than an extinguishment of interest in specific immovable property.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=40183</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>