<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (1) TMI 342 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764280</link>
    <description>CESTAT Ahmedabad dismissed Revenue&#039;s appeal regarding service tax levy on Real Estate Agent services. The appellant company sold land initially purchased for profit. The tribunal relied on precedent in identical transaction case involving same appellant, where it was held that such activities cannot be charged service tax under Real Estate Agent category. The tribunal concluded appellant&#039;s land sale activities were not taxable under Real Estate Agent service provisions, ruling in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Jan 2025 08:37:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=787209" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (1) TMI 342 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764280</link>
      <description>CESTAT Ahmedabad dismissed Revenue&#039;s appeal regarding service tax levy on Real Estate Agent services. The appellant company sold land initially purchased for profit. The tribunal relied on precedent in identical transaction case involving same appellant, where it was held that such activities cannot be charged service tax under Real Estate Agent category. The tribunal concluded appellant&#039;s land sale activities were not taxable under Real Estate Agent service provisions, ruling in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764280</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>