<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (1) TMI 396 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764334</link>
    <description>The petition challenged the vires of section 16(2)(c) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, and the corresponding Gujarat GST provision, on the basis that the input tax credit regime places the burden on the purchaser to satisfy the statutory condition for credit. Rule was issued, the petition was directed to be heard with allied matters, and the corrected returnable date was recorded after allowing the speaking-to-minutes note.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2025 14:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=787155" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (1) TMI 396 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764334</link>
      <description>The petition challenged the vires of section 16(2)(c) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, and the corresponding Gujarat GST provision, on the basis that the input tax credit regime places the burden on the purchaser to satisfy the statutory condition for credit. Rule was issued, the petition was directed to be heard with allied matters, and the corrected returnable date was recorded after allowing the speaking-to-minutes note.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764334</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>