https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764344 The HC set aside the impugned order dated 30.08.2024, finding that the petitioner was not given a fair opportunity to contest discrepancies due to inadequate notice delivery under the GST framework. The court emphasized the principles of natural justice, particularly the right to be heard, and determined that the petitioner should be granted another opportunity to address the discrepancies. The penalties for non-compliance, specifically non-generation of E-way bills, were deemed disproportionate. The petitioner was allowed to deposit 25% of disputed taxes and file objections, with the respondent required to verify compliance and provide a hearing opportunity. en-us Mon, 09 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 08 Jan 2025 08:37:21 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764344 The HC set aside the impugned order dated 30.08.2024, finding that the petitioner was not given a fair opportunity to contest discrepancies due to inadequate notice delivery under the GST framework. The court emphasized the principles of natural justice, particularly the right to be heard, and determined that the petitioner should be granted another opportunity to address the discrepancies. The penalties for non-compliance, specifically non-generation of E-way bills, were deemed disproportionate. The petitioner was allowed to deposit 25% of disputed taxes and file objections, with the respondent required to verify compliance and provide a hearing opportunity. Case-Laws GST Mon, 09 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=764344