<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (10) TMI 1603 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459988</link>
    <description>Electoral affidavit disclosure under the Representation of the People Act, 1951 must be read purposively with Rule 4-A and Form 26 to ensure voters receive complete information on a candidate&#039;s criminal antecedents. The disclosure requirement is not limited to cases where charges have been framed; it also covers pending cases where cognizance has been taken. Non-disclosure of information mandated by the prescribed affidavit may amount to a false or incomplete disclosure and attract penal consequences under Section 125-A. The text states that the impugned order could not stand and the complaint had to be reconsidered by the trial court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Jan 2025 19:56:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=787110" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (10) TMI 1603 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459988</link>
      <description>Electoral affidavit disclosure under the Representation of the People Act, 1951 must be read purposively with Rule 4-A and Form 26 to ensure voters receive complete information on a candidate&#039;s criminal antecedents. The disclosure requirement is not limited to cases where charges have been framed; it also covers pending cases where cognizance has been taken. Non-disclosure of information mandated by the prescribed affidavit may amount to a false or incomplete disclosure and attract penal consequences under Section 125-A. The text states that the impugned order could not stand and the complaint had to be reconsidered by the trial court.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459988</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>